Ever since I took my first multivariable math class, I've been fascinated by the calculus of manifolds, particularly the rare and interesting cases. As an undergraduate I prepared the following information about hyperbolic space as part of a presentation on the subject. I hope that you find this as interesting as I do!

When Euclid formulated the postulates of geometry over 23
centuries ago, he supposed that through any point not on a line,
exactly one line could be drawn that did not intersect the line.
This was the famous "Fifth Postulate," which inevitably proved
correct only under certain further assumptions about the space in
which the "line" was drawn. In the figure to the right, line
is parallel to line
through point
.
But what do we mean by a "line"? From the field of
differential geometry, what we really mean is a geodesic, a
curve in space that has zero geodesic curvature and is stationary
with respect to arc length. This means that a geodesic will
always have either minimum or maximum length between two given
points in space (we usually are only concerned with the minimizing
case). In Euclidean (flat) space, this is a straight line, and
we know that the shortest distance between two points in this space
(denoted
where
is the dimension of the space) is a segment of this line.

Can there be other spaces where Euclid's Fifth Postulate does not
hold? Yes, there can. Ancient geometers were often
troubled by the axiom, and by the 18th century several
alternative geometries were established. Among these was the
notion of hyperbolic geometry. Replacing the Fifth Postulate
was a different axiom: through any point
not on line
, there exist at least two lines that do not intersect
. In the figure to the left, lines
and
intersect the
perpendicular through
at angle
,
but do not intersect
itself (the lines actually curve in hyperbolic space).
If
is the minimum such angle, then the lines
and
are said to be asymptotic to
, meaning
that they intersect at infinity. At any larger angle, the
lines are called ultraparallel, and never intersect
,
even at infinity. Note that there are an infinite number of
ultraparallel lines, but only two asymptotic lines to a given line
through a point not on it.

As hyperbolic space
is not our familiar
, it can be difficult to envision it, though they are
diffeomorphic. There are three standard models for
visualizing hyperbolic space: the Klein-Beltrami Model, the Poincaré
Disk Model, and the Half-Plane Model. These are shown as
(a), (b), and (c) to the left. Notice that (b) and (c) look
rather similar in that if the bounding circle of the disk model was
cut and straightened into a line, it would be the
-axis
of the half-plane. Even the shapes of the geodesics shown (
,
,
, and
in the figure) are preserved in this transformation. This is
what is known as a conformal mapping: angles are preserved,
even if distances are not. It is due to a powerful
theorem called the Riemann Mapping Theorem that any simply connected open
subset of
which is not all of
is conformal to the unit disk
,
including the upper half-plane

Due to the natural isomorphism between
and
, I will often refrain from
making a distinction between the two planes. Generally
coordinates in
will be denoted
, while in
I will just
use the complex number
.
Let's begin by looking at the hyperbolic half-plane
.
In the figure, we can see what appear to be circles and rays
extending from the
-axis, which I
claimed were geodesics. To prove this statement, we need to
examine arc lengths in the half-plane. In this model, the
metric has the form

which is a bit different from the Euclidean metric
.
Nevertheless, our tools from calculus will still help us out, so
let's say that one type of geodesic really is a circle on
the
-axis. We will
parameterize with the angle
in the setup shown below:

Our coordinates are chosen to be:

so that the arc length along
is:

Also, for a vertical line segment, we can calculate the length:

In the complex case, we note that

so that using the same method of derivation we can find the hyperbolic distance between two points:

Hence the general distance between two points in
is

Also note that we can show that these semicircles
and vertical rays are geodesics by considering general path lengths
in
:

Let's examine what a curve would look like in
if it were the locus of points a constant distance (1, say) from a vertical
ray.

The curves would have to be separated by a geodesic (arc of semicircle) as shown in the drawing, hence we have:

so that the curve of constant distance is actually
a Euclidean ray! It can also be shown that the locus of points a
given distance from a semicircular geodesic is a circular arc with
the same endpoints as the semicircle (though not necessarily
orthogonal to the
-axis). In fact,
sets of points of constant distance to a geodesic in any model of
the hyperbolic plane are called hypercycles, and in the
half-plane model these are lines and arcs of circles that cut the
-axis at non-right angles.

It is an interesting fact that circles in Euclidean
space are mapped to circles in hyperbolic space, though the
dependence of the circumference on the diameter is highly
non-linear. In mapping a Euclidean circle to a hyperbolic
circle, we see that the center is shifted downward, so that
, and from the metric,

so that
,
, and
. If we parameterize by
,
we can write
and
,
so that
,
and since
, we have
that the hyperbolic circumference is
.
Next Page |